search

The “kook” idea that will save our Western states


September 10, 2015

Robb: Transferring federal lands not a kook idea

And in Arizona, it has been a kook idea. In 2012, lawmakers referred a ballot proposition flatly asserting that the state had sovereignty over federal lands within our boundaries. Voters rejected it by a 2 to 1 margin.

But the idea of the federal government transferring the lands it is supposed to be managing for multiple purposes, excluding areas set aside solely for conservation, isn’t inherently kooky. The non-kooky case is made in a paper published this week by the American Legislative Exchange Council, “Federally Managed Lands in the West.”

The non-kook case begins with a recognition of where the decision will be made. States can’t legally take over federal land. The federal government would have to decide to transfer the land to the states.

That’s hardly unprecedented. In fact, it used to be standard procedure. When Illinois and Missouri were established as states, the federal government had ownership of over 90 percent of their land. Today, the federal government owns less than 5 percent.

The federal government only began retaining ownership of large swathes of land intended for multipurpose management when states in the West began to be formed.

The federal government has retained ownership of about half the land in the 12 Western states. It owns over 80 percent of Nevada and two-thirds of Utah. It owns 42 percent of Arizona.

map

Would the states do a better job of managing these lands? That depends on whether you think the lands should lay fallow or be put to productive use.

The federal government loses money on the public lands it manages. The states make money, and quite a bit of it.

Read the FULL article here!

 

Reach Robb at robert.robb@arizonarepublic.com

Reposted by Reagangirl.com  9/10/15

  1. Somehow, by some concerted effort, the western states, where all the so called public lands are located, must retake control of that which inherently belongs to the state where the land is located. Could the states do a better job of taking care of their own property? What do you think? Who can better take care of you and your family, you or the federal government? Perhaps, only civil war will solve this dilemma, for that is what it is, a dilemma. For those that can actually read with comprehension, the defense rests.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

close
Search ReaganGirl
search
Newest Posts
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
The Truth About Islam
Networked Blogs
search

Hi, guest!

settings

menu
WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera