search

IF IT QUACKS LIKE A DEMOCRAT, IT MUST BE A…


BFF! Ron Paul and the wacky Left.

December 28, 2011

Matthew 7:15

15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

If it walks like an ass, if it brays like an ass, it must be…A RON PAUL SUPPORTER?!? Yes, the evidence seems to support that conclusion. And the revelation of a website devoted to deception in the form of a Blue-state, Democrat Donkey, Ron Paul insurgence, clinches the case. I’ve endured the slings and arrows of outrageous Paulbots for several months now in my quest to dissect their contradictory, delusional, and downright bizarre worldviews. My conclusions regarding Ron Paul and many, NOT ALL, Ron Paul supporters are these:

Have you heard of BlueRepublican.org?  It is the leftist/lemming/sheep/Paulbot Frankenstein’s Monster website that I will use as my final exhibit in the case of “Conservatives Who Actually Want to Beat Obama vs Ron Paul.” Blue Republican is an activist website designed to introduce chaos into the electoral process for 2012, and thus ensure a win for an incumbent President who is the most incompetent, extreme, arrogant, destructive, and un-American political figure to ever attain the title of “Leader of the Free World.” Using Ron Paul as the front of the re-elect Obama campaign, peacenik, dope-smoking, sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll Liberals are manipulating the caucuses and primaries with their phantom votes to drive him to win the GOP presidential nomination. Even brain-dead Liberals (but apparently not Paulbots) grasp the fact that the polarizing figure of Ron Paul will result in a rancorous split in the conservative vote, and President Teleprompter will win another, undeserved and very lethal, term in office.

I’ve said for a number of weeks now that the Ron Paul phenomenon looks suspiciously like a Leftist, anti-military, anti-American insurgence, and that our hapless Conservative friends who apply their affections to the doddering oldster have been deceived by an infiltration by the Left. The insurgents have cleverly used pro-Constitution, pro-liberty rhetoric, but their designs are perpetual bondage, and the destruction of the Constitution, its separation of powers, and the Bill of Rights, through another Obama victory in 2012.

Lemmings, sheep, Paulbots; call them what you will, but when the Ron Paul movement walks like a blue ass, brays like a blue ass, and employs deceptive strategies to destroy the Republican party in 2012, you can bet that they are Liberal Democrats at their ugliest.

By Marjorie Haun 12/28/11

  1. John Frantum

    What I find most disturbing is the purist threat of non-involvement in the election process, or even a migration to the dark side if their diminutive Messiah fails to win the nomination.
    When has the concept of “taking back my toys, and going home” ever really proven beneficial?
    Another thing that most libertarians/constitutionalists don’t seem to grasp, is that the classic liberalism ideaology in our system of government will not work in a society that has thrown morality, religiosity (of the Judeo-Christian philosophy) and virtue to the wayside.
    Maybe one day, through social pressure, individual responsibility and a refusal to feed the beast of depravity, we might be able to restore liberty as the framers intended and implement the libertarian model, but it will be a long and painful journey, not the highway to instant gratification that Paul supporters expect upon his immaculation.
    It took liberal progressives and socialists decades to pull apart the fabric of our society, to think it can be reversed in one election cycle is akin to searching for lolipop trees and unicorns.

  2. Michael Scheuer Endorses Ron Paul for President

    Michael Scheuer is the former head of the Bin Laden unit for the CIA. He was with the CIA for 22 years. He quit in disgust after the 9-11 commission report was released. He is the best-selling author of four books on the subject of foreign policy and the Middle East, and he is a painful thorn in the side of the establishment.

    ** another endoresement from someone who knows **

  3. The beauty of being Ron Paul is that not only can you get away with wildly inaccurate claims during presidential debates, people actually EXPECT you to make them.

    • My issues are less with Ron Paul than those who follow him. I actually like Ron Paul very much. I am troubled by the “BlueRepublican” movement, which by the way, I don’t think Ron Paul has instigated. Those on the extreme branch of Libertarian thinking have latched on to Ron Paul largely because of his opinions on National Defense, the war on drugs, legalized pot, etc. They are less likely to pay attention to the Constituitional imperatives espoused by Ron Paul and most Conservatives. And they completely ignore the absolute necessity of having a Conservative president, and House, and Senate if we are to begin to address the unconstitutional powers that have been ursurped by government agencies. The Blue Republican movement is essentially an effort by Democrats and Liberals to use the GOP primary process to have Ron Paul run against Obama. Ron Paul, who can never get above the high teens even in GOP polls, would almost certainly lose against Obama.

      • You are very wrong, Marge. Ron Paul is a very evil person and he has personally instigated this and attracted (deliberately) these people – because he’s one of them. Like them, he’s an anarcho-libertarian. His intellectual father was Murray Rothbard.

        • That may be true Ziggy. I think Ron Paul is frankly weak-minded and he wants to have a following so he manages to recruit the dregs of society into his delusional army. But is it evil in the case of Ron Paul, or just dementia induced by decades of cannabis poisoning? 🙂

  4. Donkeys

    The Stevenage game should have told our fans some thing is in the water when Spurs are next on the menu all our last 13 games will have one thing in common work rate will be high. The game against went like this Utd let us have the ball and when we threatened there goal they all got behind the ball and took it of us or made us miss our chances. When we did score once again one of our players got in the way of the goal would Saha have scored anyway we wont no. Then Utd had there second corner and some bad defending lost us the ball we then gave away a free kick and we all no what happens when Utd have not bossed the game and Alex boot throwing Ferguson is waiting to bollock them. The goal showed what is wrong with our exciting attacking team with a shaky defence Friedel is only a shot stopper and and the wrong side of forty and if Harry does not change things our defence will keep losing games we should win or draw. The three goals where all stoppable by Friedel and this is why all defences make mistakes and this is when you keeper can win or lose games Friedel leaves every cross to his defence to clear Mnangers now this and especially Young who played with and knew Freidel would not come for his free kick Young picked out maxi muscled Rooney being marked by Walkerand it was a goal. This is what should have happened with the angle of the cross the ball would be hard to defend so Friedel should have tracked the ball and punched it away. The second Goal was down to Modric who hesitated when the ball was thrown to the Utd playerbut Friedel should have snuffed the ball out by diving on the weak cross that Walker messed up by using his wrong foot to defend the ballso all three wher at fault for the second goal Modric Friedel Wlaker Friedel twice not cutting the cross out before Walkers gaff and also he was inside is goal when young hit the net and left a gap for him to score. The last goal was again caused by two players Kaboul standing of Young and Friedel again who was way of his line inviting Young to shoot. He knew how to beat forty year old Friedel from the Villa training Ground this would have been an easier shot to save if Friedel was on his line. This would be a seven foot dive and tip over but where he was it became nine foot save he could not reach and the ball sailed over his Fort year old slower body. This is now the time to bring back Gomes because this team can cope with one gaff but five and three goals is terminal.

  5. An excellent article, Marge, except one issue. You believe that Ron Paul, if he runs 3rd party, will ensure that Obama is reelected and that if his supporters vote for him rather than the GOP candidate (or stay home), Obama will be reelected. I disagree, because, as you said yourself in your article, the vast majority of his supporters are anti-defense and anti-military activists, racists, anti-Semites, 9/11 truthers (Ron Paul is a bona fide 9/11 truther himself), Code Pinkos, OWS activists, and loons. These people would never vote for a Republican presidential nominee anyway. This type of people always votes for Democrats. So if Ron Paul runs 3rd party, or endorses a 3rd party candidate, he will be siphoning votes away from Obama, NOT Romney. Go, Ron “Blame America First” Paul, go!

    Of course, there are a few naive conservatives whom Ron Paul has unfortunately managed to fool. Our mission, as conservatives, is to open their eyes, and to develop antibodies in all other conservatives, so that they will know who Ron Paul and his supporters are and to reject their ideology and their policies.

    We need to alert our fellow conservatives to the technique that Paulbots are currently using to fool them: the 90% technique. The aim of this tactic is to gain your trust on 90% of the issues so that you will look the other way on the other 10%. The 10% that counts.

    We need to point out to our fellow conservatives that if someone proposes deep defense cuts and/or isolationism, he or she is not a conservative and it doesn’t matter what else he/she says that sounds good, because he/she is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

    • Ziggy, you should see the Ron Paul brigades in Colorado. My article, Zombies of the GOP is a pretty good overview, but they range from occupy types to angry alcoholics to subversive atheistic yuppies to grumpy old Tea Party farts. The one thing they all have in common in an intractable sense that the world is a bad place and only Ron Paul can fix it. They talk about the Constitution, but they look to a single man to effect the change they want (and who knows what the heck that is) and not their individual power.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

close
Search ReaganGirl
search
Newest Posts
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
The Truth About Islam
Networked Blogs
search

Hi, guest!

settings

menu
WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera