Month: March 2012
Unmanned strike aircraft are no substitute because they don’t have the sufficient range, payload capability, degree of stealthiness, or other attributes that bombers, especially B-2 bombers, provide.
Obama stands in opposition to the substance of men who had true grit, the tough justice that won the freedom of people on the American continent as well as distant shores and many lands.
Do “defense hawks” really dominate the GOP? The answer is no. In fact, we defense conservatives have little, if any, influence on the Party and are now being thrown out of it and ignored by fiscal conservatives, who now have a stranglehold on the GOP.
And the evidence of that is the policies actually adopted by the federal government AND the Republican Party over the last 3 years.
The truth is that the sequester’s defense cuts, if they go through, WILL be devastating, and that’s because they were DELIBERATELY designed to be. The logic was that, with such a sword of Damocles hanging over both defense (which conservatives care about) and the Medicare program (which liberals care about), the Super Committee would be so scared that they would manage to somehow craft a compromise deal by November 23rd, 2011. Such an assumption would’ve been logical if we were talking about something other than a government organization, or at least anything other than the US Congress. But, as conservative Senate candidate Adam Hasner says, “count on Washington to fail to do its job”. The Congress, as usual, failed to do its job, and thus the sequester was triggered.
Defense was being held hostage, with the sequester threatening to kill it if the Super Committee failed to come up with $1.5 trill
So, Milton. No more of this crap about Obama just being a “guy who is in over his head.” I understand that you have been a Mormon Bishop, you are genuinely a nice guy. But you should know about EVIL! Obama is a SOCIALIST! He lies! He is narcissistic, smug, hypocritical, unctuous, and arrogant! EEEEEVIIILLL!
If this was to occur, that would leave the United States with less than 1% of the nuclear weapons it had in 1967. The radical “Nuclear Zero” concept, which envisions the United States leading the world in the total elimination of nuclear weapons, has been widely touted in our own State Department, and seems to uphold the notion that President Obama’s ultimate goal is to eliminate the United States’ nuclear arsenal in its entirety.
March is the time of year we ______ (celebrate, regurgitate, masticate) Saint Patrick’s Day. Saint Patrick was a ______ (cop, fireman, altar boy) who traveled to ______ (Firbolg, Eire, West Hollywood) and became a sheep ______ (skin, herder, concierge).
In the latest poll from The Washington Times and JZ Analytics, 48 percent said the U.S. should maintain a policy of intervening where its interests are challenged. But 46 percent disagree, saying the country is “in a new global era” where it can no longer take such an active role.
That is because our minds, in assessing the crisis of liberty in our time, are drawn back to the conditions of our centuries-old Founding, and the glorious inception of a new and free nation. But we are not like the Founders. We are not the midwife helping along the birth of a republic. We are the physician presiding over the greatest nation in the world as it languishes in spasms of dying; beset with moral disease, and the dementia of age wherein it has forgotten for what purpose it was born. We have failed to check the health of the best example of government of the people, for the people and by the people, yet remaining upon the face of the earth. The toxins of socialism and secularism have infected its members, and it is quickly failing.
Attack Racism asserts that individuals of another race or nationality are not equal because they are genetically differentiated from the racist who asserts superiority (Attack Racism is practiced by individuals and regimes of all colors from David Duke, to Jeremiah Wright, to Nazi Facists). Paternalistic Racism asserts that a man is limited by his race, nationality, or condition of social status, and therefore relatively impotent against prevailing social forces